On the Golden Rule and what we eat
The great thinkers of history rarely spoke about food or animals. Yet it is worth taking their wise insights and applying them to your own life. Whoever endures the initial resistance is rewarded with a clarity that makes their relationship with animals and with fellow human beings freer than they had expected.
Hippocrates gave physicians their guiding principle: do no harm. But it serves equally well as a guide for daily life. Before you add something, look at what you subtract. Before you solve a problem, make sure you have correctly identified it. Whoever applies this rule consistently to their own choices will inevitably encounter an honest question: what harm does my diet cause: to animals, to the planet, to my own body? Not as an accusation. As a mirror.
Epictetus distinguished between what is yours and what is not. The weather, other people's opinions, whether your plans fall apart, not yours. What is yours: your reaction, your choice, your intention. Eating meat feels like a given, something determined outside yourself by culture, habit, upbringing. But it is a choice. Every single day. That awareness alone sets something free.
Jung observed how what you refuse to see controls you from the shadows. Looking away gives temporary relief, but the problem does not disappear, it grows. Whoever prefers not to think about how their meat comes to exist contributes silently to a system they might reject upon honest confrontation. Jung called this no weakness. He called it human. But he added: the pattern, once you name it, loses much of its power over you.
Marcus Aurelius wrote that obstacles are not barriers but teachers. The discomfort that arises from images of factory farming is no reason to look away. It is a signal. An invitation. The effort it takes to eat differently is not proof that it is too difficult, it is the place where change begins.
The Buddha was clear about attachment: it is not pain itself that causes suffering, but the clinging to it. Attachment to taste, to habit, to the social ritual of the shared table, that is what binds most people. Whoever is willing to observe that attachment without immediately being drawn into it discovers there is more room than expected.
Nietzsche saw how suffering, when met with intention, forms rather than destroys. Whoever has truly paused to consider what an animal endures before it arrives on their plate -and has been able to sit with that without looking away- is changed by it. Not broken. More open.
Seneca finally asked: whose agenda are you living? The food industry has set the norm for decades. That is no conspiracy, but a system and systems are fed by habits that nobody questions anymore. The question is not whether you can eat differently. The question is whether you are willing to pause for a moment and look honestly at what you are doing now.
These seven thinkers never knew one another and wrote in different centuries. Yet they all point in the same direction: take your own principles seriously and follow them consistently. Whoever truly accepts the Golden Rule -treat others as you would wish to be treated- cannot ultimately sidestep the question about animals. Not as an accusation. As an invitation.
|
