Discrimination in fur farming legislation
 A striking example of a not so obvious type of animal discrimination is the national regulation that was put into effect on 14th February 1995. That's when the Dutch House of Representatives seconded the motion of the then Minister of Agriculture to ban fox rearing. Although this is a joyous fact, we think it strange that not the entire fur farms trade was banned. Eighty-five percent of the fur industry's skins come from animals living captive on fur factory farms.
Different standards for different species
The minister thinks that animals may be held in captivity, as long as their well being is sufficiently guaranteed. After a lot of research, foxes appeared unsuitable to be held in captivity. And also with minks in captivity researchers established serious welfare problems, but it is thought that their well being may be "improved".
The minister decided therefore to permanently legalize mink rearing.
Animals as objects under the law
The positive thing in our legislation is that we have to take care of animals, but the negative aspect about it is that animals are regarded as objects. For minks this means that they can wait under controlled conditions in captivity until their skins reach the right proportions and they can be helped out of their coats.
A step toward ending mink farming
In the summer of 1999 Dutch Representatives called on the Minister of Agriculture to stop mink rearing as well. |
