So far so good. Unfortunately, things turn out differently when the producer of meat turns out not to behave in a responsible manner. He abuses his animals by restricting their freedom of movement and injects them with hormones and antibiotics which poison the meat they produce when slaughtered.
The consumer is not able to trust the producer and is forced to think about the undesired responsibility thrust back upon him. The consumer can search for another producer, but can also try to ignore the message or delegate the responsibility to the government.
The government in turn is dependent on the consumer and the producer to behave responsibly, because policy cannot be implemented if there is no general acceptance of it and it has to be enforced by checking every citizen's compliance.
This vicious circle is hard to break if one of the three parties (consumer, government, producer) involved is stalemating another one. And unfortunately, all three parties have a financial interest in not upsetting the others. Someone who wants to take total responsibility for his or her life and who does not want to bother anyone else, for example by not using animals, has a hard life. So many products contain meat (by)products of doubtful origin, that it is almost impossible in this society to lead a real conscientious and responsible way of life. |