Eugen Drewermann on ethics towards animals |
Eugen Drewermann (born 1940)
is a passionate man, a psychoanalyst and a theologian.
He was a Catholic priest. In 1992 he was suspended
as a priest because of his theological views.
In 2005 he left the Catholic Church.
From psychology and theology he looks at the relationship
between humans and animals.
He once said there are three things he "hates":
war, money and the way we tend to treat animals.
From his experience with people, he states that
fear leads people to violence
and aggression, both physically and economically,
also towards animals. |
Fear blocks ethical behaviour
Christian dogma has raised man to the centre
of the universe and the goal of evolution. Therefore
everything, including the animal, is subordinate to man
and exists for his benefit. As a result, no ethics towards
animals has developed. But if you do not act
ethically towards animals, can you do so towards people?
Ethics, we could say, aims to let people live
with respect and appreciation for each other. No one obliges
you to do so. But when you do, it enriches your life.
It is liberating and gives a satisfaction that you carry
with you all your life and that helps to shape your personality.
When people are indifferent to animals or, we might add, to the weaker members
of society, they do not take an ethical position.
They harm not only the other but also themselves.
And time and again it turns out that whoever once ignores
the suffering of another finds himself on a slippery
slope.
Man, certainly modern man, is aware of the finiteness
and randomness of his existence (of his "contingency").
He has lost his trust in the ground of his existence.
Therefore he does his utmost to create his own securities:
military, social and nowadays above all economic.
He subordinates everything to them. By doing so he loses
his humanity. |
Our conception of God has changed, what next?
Modern secular man no longer has a God from whom he can derive his right to exist. At
most he can acknowledge that there is a universal
consciousness or eternal energy on which he rests. But
once he has this experience, he knows it is good that
he exists as he is. He no longer needs
to prove himself all the time. Then he finds rest.
His striving for power, for superiority and for economic
growth comes to an end: that cancerous tumour
that must keep growing at the cost of the organism
that hosts it. Then he no longer suffers from himself
and can see the weaker, including
animals.
In the love between people who are
themselves without fear, the
other is left free while both keep their responsibility.
You help the other person to go his own way in his own manner.
That basic attitude can be extended to animals.
Towards animals man has a greater responsibility, because they, like children, have less control over their circumstances.
In the ever smaller free space
on earth, man has to influence circumstances in such a
way that animals too can keep their freedom.
Read also: Erich Fromm: towards a sane society and how animals can benefit from that development; Inner freedom and our relationship with animals. |
|
|