Untruths that cause animal suffering

Much animal suffering is linked to old beliefs

Untruths about animals have been passed on for centuries. They are persistent because they are convenient: whoever believes that an animal feels no pain, has no awareness or simply exists for humans, can use it with a clear conscience.

Using animals is not the problem in itself. The problem begins where use turns into abuse and where knowledge about animals gives way to fallacious reasoning that justifies that abuse. That is why this page is part of our series on fallacies and demagogy.

This question is more topical than ever. In theory, the need to use animals has disappeared: we know how to eat a healthy plant-based diet and people often take a pet for the wrong reasons. What remains is habit, convenience, economic interest and the old untruths that keep them going.

From knowledge to abuse

This is how it slides, step by step. An example:

  1. KnowledgeA cow cares for her calf and calls out when it is taken away
  2. BeliefThat’s just ‘maternal instinct’
  3. UntruthAn animal doesn’t really feel what a human feels
  4. FallacyShe’ll soon forget, so there’s no harmTypes of fallacies →
  5. AbuseCalves are routinely taken from their mothers shortly after birthRead more →

The tipping point: as soon as an untruth reasons away the animal’s interest, use becomes abuse.

Animal Freedom wants to expose untruths that cause or maintain animal suffering. Some examples of these "untruths" follow. For each one we show what we know and which fallacy lies behind it.

“Man is superior to animals”

What we know: Humans and animals share a common descent. Greater intelligence gives no right to use others.

Fallacy: Appeal to unknown arguments

Read the article →

“Bullfighting is culture: the bull was created for it”

What we know: How old a tradition is says nothing about its moral value. In the arena the bull is weakened, wounded and killed. As a tourist, your ticket helps keep it going.

Fallacy: Appeal to supposed relation

Read the fallacies about bullfighting →

“Children grow big and strong from eating meat”

What we know: Children also grow up healthy without meat. The image comes mainly from meat industry advertising.

Fallacy: Appeal to authority

Read the article →

“Milk is good for your bones”

What we know: Milk is not indispensable: calcium and protein are also found in plant foods.

Fallacy: Appeal to supposed common sense

Read the article →

“Animal testing is necessary for the development of medication”

What we know: Results of animal tests often do not translate well to humans. More and more animal-free methods are available.

Fallacy: Appeal to authority

Read the article →

“Meat (protein) is a healthy and necessary part of your diet”

What we know: The body does not need protein itself, but its building blocks (amino acids): protein is first broken down in the gut. Plants contain the same building blocks; eat a varied plant-based diet and you get them all.

Fallacy: Evasion of evidence

Read the article →

“Pets are good for stimulating children’s sense of responsibility”

What we know: A child mainly learns that animals may be locked up; the care usually falls to the parents.

Fallacy: Appeal to supposed common sense

Read the article →

“Animals lack something humans have”

What we know: Animals know pain, fear, emotions, relationships and awareness. Not saying it in words does not mean they do not feel it.

Fallacy: Appeal to ignorance

Read more on this page ↓

“Consumption of (parts of) dogs and/or other animals gives potency and love”

What we know: There is no evidence for this. But the superstition keeps poaching and animal suffering going.

Fallacy: Appeal to supposed relation

Read more on this page ↓

Is man superior to animals?

embryos In our history the capacities of animals, discussed below, have been "reasoned away" by people who found it necessary to place people above animals. From this self-constructed position they could justify their immoral behavior toward animals. They would not have this justification if they had to recognize that people are basically a species of animal.

Now that humans really no longer need the submission of animals for their own survival, and are still maintaining it to reap economic benefits, it's time to give back to animals what was taken from them: to be equal habitants of this planet, with the same rights we allow ourselves.

Pigs are more intelligent than dogs, but does that matter?

Do animals have properties such as: intelligence, awareness, pain, language, responsibility, and self-control? Do animals have relationships, do they have feelings like nervousness, love, anger, guilt, fun, sorrow, fear? Can animals stand up for themselves? Do they dream? Can animals think?

is this funny? Nobody can deny that animals possess most of these traits, and for other traits we have thought up different names, so that they appear to be different. The affection and care a mother displays for her offspring is called "instinct" in animals, as if to say that animals, like some sort of machines, "display maternal behavior". Don't be misled: animal behavior toward their offspring is characterized by almost all the same things as human behavior.

Anglers mistakenly justify their animal abuse by denying that fish can feel pain, fear or stress.

Realizing your own mortality

Others think that animals do not realize their own mortality and point to the phenomenon that animals passively go to their deaths in the slaughterhouse. Newspapers regularly publish reports about animals that do not want to die and try to escape. Sometimes these animals receive a "general amnesty" and are cared for by other people. It's safe to wonder whether those animals that passively go to the slaughter aren't consciously choosing to end their animal-unworthy existence. Maybe the imprisoned mother animal that bites her young to death is not so crazy. She is protecting her young from her own fate.

Awareness

Neurologist Antonio Damasio says that only living beings can have awareness, and that organisms are aware of themselves and their relationships with the outside world. The basis for this is the development of a self in the brain, which is necessary to maintain the image of the organism. This is a need for self-regulation and self-representation that is deeply anchored inside the organism. From this theory we can conclude that even animals have awareness, and also that computers will never have it.

Dog meat trade in Asia

dogs in a cage In the following text we will (briefly) touch upon the prejudice that animals lack certain qualities that people have.

5 dogs on their way to the market where they will be sold to people who will butcher and eat them.

In Asia (China, Korea, Vietnam) people have always kept dogs for consumption. Lately this practice has started to assume factory-farming-like proportions. For them this practice is just as normal as eating pigs is for us.

How do you recognise fallacies and respond to them? →

Which fallacy is this? Play the game

Test yourself: which fallacy is this?

Ten statements about animals that you hear all the time. Can you spot the fallacy? After each answer you read why it does not hold.

Play the game →

This article is part of a series on fallacies and demagogy

Some arguments used in debate on the topics in the title simply are invalid. That goes for pro and contra.

We selected a few of the most rigid arguments from different situations and placed an appropriate counterargument.

Because a more clear and honest way of reasoning helps improve the circumstances animals live in. Apart from the specific issues there are the types of arguments in general.

Fallacies are deliberately or accidentally used in a debate.

So be aware of the principles and the integrity of an opponent.

How do you respond to fallacies? Six tips

Give the other person the benefit of the doubt. Start by assuming a misunderstanding, not deliberate deception. Even someone who keeps using fallacies may simply be badly informed or emotionally involved.

  • Mind the context. In a friendly conversation a gentle approach works better than in a formal debate. Adapt to your relationship with the other person and to the aim of the conversation.
  • Stay calm. Fallacies are often meant to stir up emotions. Keep your own emotions in check.
  • Identify the fallacy. Try to understand where the reasoning goes wrong. Do this for yourself, not to catch the other person out.
  • Answer the fallacy. Ask clarifying questions or explain why the argument does not convince you. Avoid technical terms.
  • Stay on topic. Bring the conversation back to what it is about and keep it on a rational level.
  • Be prepared. If you know you will talk to someone who often uses fallacies, gather some facts and arguments beforehand.

See also how to respond to animal-unfriendly behaviour of others.

Non-valid arguments (deceptive arguments) for different groups